Skip to content
Adult arranging three blank cards on a planning board.

Plastic surgery · Decision-planning study

Cosmetic
Surgery
Planning

Keep the options open.
Make each question clear.

A cosmetic surgery request begins a decision, not a treatment plan. Work through goals, alternatives including no procedure, information gaps, material trade-offs and the practical questions a qualified care team must answer.

Fourteen fictional cases on goals, options, material risks and conditional next steps.

Choose a package
Lessons in the full curriculum
14
Thematic modules
4
Format
Case-based study
Delivery and access
Confirm by email

For clinicians, coordinators, educators and advanced trainees

Plan the conversation
before the procedure.

For people working within their clinical or educational role, this course develops general decision-planning literacy for adult elective cosmetic surgery. Its patient-facing prompts may also help an adult prepare questions for a qualified consultation.

The lessons separate a person's goals from a presumed procedure. Learners compare reasonable options, including no intervention, and identify health, provider, facility, cost and follow-up questions that remain for the treating team.

Fourteen fictional exercises move from an open decision map to a conditional coordination record. The course does not diagnose a person, declare candidacy, obtain consent, design an individual surgical or anesthetic plan, teach operative steps or guarantee a result.

Skills you will practice

A decision map
with room to pause.

01

Define the goal

Record appearance and functional concerns in the person's own terms, along with uncertainties and outcome limits.

02

Keep alternatives visible

Compare surgery, less-invasive options where relevant, no intervention and reasons for further assessment.

03

Identify review questions

Separate missing health, surgeon, facility and anesthesia information without issuing a suitability verdict.

04

Compare material trade-offs

Set possible benefits beside harms, costs, recovery needs and uncertainty rather than a promised result.

05

Prepare a consent discussion

Surface unanswered questions, reflection time and the option to defer for the treating clinician's conversation.

06

Coordinate conditionally

Name responsibilities, contacts, privacy boundaries and a point to review or pause the proposed plan.

Course curriculum

Four modules.
Fourteen decision steps.

Fourteen lessons in four modules. Open each lesson for a measurable objective, four developed topics, source-mapped reading and a fictional exercise with pass criteria. Each module ends with a synthesis checkpoint.

$19 package: lessons 1–10$29 package: lessons 1–14

Module 01 · Lessons 1–3

Goals and Decision Readiness

Define the planning task, capture goals in the person's own terms, and recognize when the decision should remain open.

Two adults having a calm conversation on a garden terrace.
01The Scope and Sequence of Cosmetic Surgery Planning

Learning objective

Given a fictional adult's initial request, produce a dated decision map with five fields—goal, options, information still needed, responsible clinical conversation, and next review point—without selecting treatment or declaring readiness.

In this lesson

  • Define a planning record rather than a treatment decision: Start with the adult's own question, the date, and what remains uncertain. A planning record organizes a future consultation; it does not name an operation, pronounce suitability, or substitute for the treating professional's advice. The [NHS decision guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/) begins with motivation, alternatives, cost, and time to decide, all of which can be recorded before any procedure is chosen.
  • Sequence questions without implying inevitability: Arrange the work as goals and expectations, reasonable options including no intervention, health and provider questions, material trade-offs, then practical follow-up. Keep each stage provisional: a new answer can return the person to an earlier question or end the process. [NHS preparation guidance](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/before-you-have-a-cosmetic-procedure/) asks people to research the procedure, understand costs, speak to a professional, and take time before committing.
  • Give each uncertainty an appropriate owner: Separate a question the adult can reflect on, such as what they hope to change, from one only a qualified professional can answer, such as procedure-specific risk or clinical suitability. Record the intended discussion partner and leave the answer blank until that conversation occurs. The [GMC patient guide](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/patient-guides-and-materials/cosmetic-procedures-what-do-i-need-to-consider) describes what to consider before an appointment and what to expect from cosmetic practitioners in its UK context.
  • Keep the route reversible: Write a review date or trigger and an explicit option to pause, seek more information, or walk away. Payment, a booked slot, a persuasive image, or a completed checklist does not settle the underlying decision. The [NHS decision guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/) warns against pressure and hurried offers, while its [preparation advice](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/before-you-have-a-cosmetic-procedure/) emphasizes taking time after a consultation.
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional 38-year-old adult, Mara, saves a clinic advertisement for a cosmetic procedure after a milestone birthday but has not met a practitioner. Build a dated five-field decision map from her statement, 'I want to look less tired,' including two open questions and a review trigger. Do not choose a procedure.

Pass criteria: Pass when the map has all five fields, preserves Mara's wording, distinguishes her reflection questions from clinical questions, includes no-intervention as a live branch, identifies a qualified consultation as the venue for patient-specific advice, and treats the review point as conditional rather than a surgery date.

02Patient Goals, Function, and Outcome Limits

Learning objective

Separate a fictional adult's appearance goal, possible functional concern, and wider life hope in the adult's own words, then write four questions about realistic outcome limits for the treating surgeon.

In this lesson

  • Capture the person's words before translating them: Document the feature or experience the adult wants to change, why it matters, and how long the concern has existed. Avoid replacing 'I want less attention on this feature' with a technical procedure name or a clinician's assumed goal. The [NHS decision guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/) asks about motivations and life context; the [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/) asks patients to explain what they want to change and why.
  • Keep appearance and function in separate columns: An appearance preference may coexist with a symptom or practical difficulty, but the learner should not infer that surgery will improve either. List each reported issue as a question for clinical assessment and ask whether another explanation or care pathway is relevant. The [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/) encourages discussion of goals and medical conditions with the operating surgeon; neither a course worksheet nor a marketing image can establish a functional diagnosis.
  • Replace perfection claims with testable questions: Ask what degree and type of change may be realistic, what may remain unchanged, how long any effect may last, and what outcome uncertainty matters most to this person. Before-and-after photographs can prompt discussion but cannot predict an individual's result. The [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/) explicitly frames reasonable improvement rather than perfection; [GMC guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/maintaining-trust) bars misleading or guaranteed result claims in UK practice.
  • Separate a desired change from a hoped-for life change: If a person hopes surgery will improve a relationship, career, or self-worth, record that hope without endorsing the causal claim. Ask what support or nonprocedural approach could address that wider concern and allow a qualified professional to explore it respectfully. The [NHS decision guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/) distinguishes appearance from other parts of wellbeing and suggests discussing emotional concerns rather than expecting a procedure to solve them.
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional 44-year-old adult, Devon, says a facial feature looks different in photographs and also mentions occasional discomfort, then adds that a new appearance might improve a strained relationship. Make a two-column appearance/function note, record the appearance goal, reported discomfort, and relationship hope separately in Devon's words, and write four surgeon questions about achievable and non-achievable outcomes.

Pass criteria: Pass when appearance, reported discomfort, and relationship hope remain distinct; the learner does not diagnose the discomfort or promise relationship improvement; at least four questions address realistic change, unchanged features, duration, and uncertainty; and clinical assessment is assigned to the treating surgeon.

03Motivation, Voluntariness, and Reasons to Pause

Learning objective

Identify at least four possible pressure or distress signals in a fictional adult story and draft a neutral pause-and-referral note that preserves the person's choice without making a psychological diagnosis or consent determination.

In this lesson

  • Ask whose goal is driving the request: Explore whether the wish is longstanding and self-directed or connected to a partner's demand, a workplace comment, a recent event, or a promotional deadline. A contextual signal warrants a question, not an automatic verdict about the person. The [NHS decision guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/) asks whether the procedure is for oneself or to please someone else; [GMC guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork) requires UK clinicians to satisfy themselves that a request is voluntary.
  • Recognize pressure without grading capacity: Time-limited discounts, a companion answering every question, or fear of disappointing someone can impair a calm decision conversation. Record the observed facts and the adult's own words, then arrange private, unhurried discussion with an appropriately qualified professional where needed. The [NHS decision guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/) warns about rushed offers; the [GMC communication standard](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork) requires time and information for a voluntary decision in UK practice.
  • Route psychological concerns to qualified review: Distress, an expectation that surgery will resolve broad life problems, or a history the person wants to discuss should prompt respectful inquiry and, where appropriate, qualified mental-health support. The learner must not label a disorder, score candidacy, or present a single concern as a universal exclusion. The [RCS professional standards](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/standards-and-guidance/service-standards/cosmetic-surgery/professional-standards-for-cosmetic-surgery/) address psychologically vulnerable patients, and [NHS advice](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/) points to appropriate support for wider anxiety. [Medical Board of Australia guidelines](https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Policies/Cosmetic-medical-and-surgical-procedures-guidelines.aspx?s=03).
  • Make pausing a legitimate outcome: A pause can mean gathering missing information, speaking privately, discussing a concern with a clinician, seeking another opinion, or choosing no procedure. State what remains open and who will revisit it, without using the pause to pressure the adult toward eventual surgery. [GMC guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork) says patients can change their minds; [GMC trust standards](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/maintaining-trust) prohibit promotional tactics that encourage ill-considered decisions in UK practice.
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional 32-year-old adult, Leila, requests a quick booking after a breakup. A companion repeatedly answers for her, and a clinic email says a discount expires tonight. Write a neutral note listing observable signals, two private questions for Leila, an appropriate qualified-review route, and a clear pause option.

Pass criteria: Pass when at least four signals are named as observations rather than diagnoses, the note protects an unpressured conversation, identifies who should review distress or voluntariness, gives no candidacy or capacity verdict, and makes declining or delaying the procedure an acceptable outcome.

Module checkpoint

A fictional adult arrives with an appearance wish, a possible functional complaint, strong family pressure, and a prepaid consultation. Create a dated decision map with goals in the adult's words, distinct functional questions, at least three unresolved clinical or option questions, the responsible professional for each, and a voluntary pause route. Pass requires no diagnosis, treatment selection, suitability verdict, promised life outcome, or assumption that payment equals consent. [NHS decision guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/); [GMC communication standard](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork).

Module 02 · Lessons 4–6

Options and Suitability Inputs

Keep reasonable options open while gathering the questions that a qualified clinician and care team must answer.

Adult pausing before open aisles in a library.
04Surgery, Less-Invasive Options, and No Intervention

Learning objective

Construct a three-branch comparison for a fictional adult—surgery, a possible less-invasive approach, and no intervention—with benefits sought, uncertainties, burdens, and clinician questions for each branch.

In this lesson

  • Keep the option set open before comparing it: Write the desired change first, then list surgery, potentially relevant less-invasive approaches, and no procedure as questions to discuss. Do not assume that a particular non-surgical method is suitable, equivalent, or even available for this person. The [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/) asks about alternatives to surgery and the benefits and risks of each; the [NHS decision guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/) asks whether other ways could achieve the desired change. [NICE shared decision-making recommendations](https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197/chapter/Recommendations).
  • Compare burdens as well as hoped-for benefits: For every branch, ask about potential benefit, likelihood and durability, material harms, repeat treatment, recovery, total cost, and impact on daily life. No intervention has no procedural burden but may leave the original concern unchanged; that is a trade-off to articulate, not a failure to plan. The [GMC communication standard](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork) requires discussion of less-risk alternatives when available and patient-relevant adverse outcomes in UK practice.
  • Separate evidence from promotional comparison: A clinic's claim that one option is 'simple' or 'permanent' should become a source and duration question, not a table entry presented as fact. Ask the treating professional what evidence applies to the proposed intervention and where uncertainty remains. The [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/) prompts patients to ask how reliable the procedure evidence is and how long results might last; [GMC trust guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/maintaining-trust) rejects guaranteed outcomes.
  • Use the table to prepare a conversation: A comparison matrix is complete when unanswered cells are visible and assigned to a qualified clinician; it is not a scoring algorithm that picks a winner. A person may seek another opinion, revisit goals, or choose no treatment after hearing the trade-offs. The [GMC patient guide](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/patient-guides-and-materials/cosmetic-procedures-what-do-i-need-to-consider) frames the pre-appointment questions, while the [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/) locates procedure advice with the operating surgeon.
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional 51-year-old adult, Priya, wants a visible but modest change before considering any intervention. A clinic brochure advertises an operation and a non-surgical service; Priya has not received individual advice. Make a three-branch table with five comparison fields and one specific clinical question per branch.

Pass criteria: Pass when all three branches remain live, no treatment is labelled suitable or equivalent without assessment, the matrix covers benefit, risk, durability, recovery or repeat burden, and cost, promotional claims are marked unverified, and the treating clinician is assigned to answer patient-specific questions.

05Health History and Suitability Questions for Clinical Review

Learning objective

Prepare a fictional clinical-review handoff that groups at least six relevant history or support questions, marks unknowns, and names the qualified reviewer without assigning a risk score or candidacy verdict.

In this lesson

  • Collect history as questions, not clearance criteria: Ask what medical conditions, symptoms, prior procedures, allergies, and current treatments the adult needs to disclose to the treating team. Missing history should be marked 'unknown' rather than silently treated as normal. The [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/) tells patients to discuss medical conditions and all medications with their surgeon. Only the qualified team can interpret that history for the proposed procedure, setting, and person.
  • Include anesthesia-relevant information without prescribing it: A handoff can ask about prior anesthesia reactions, breathing or sleep concerns, medication and supplement lists, and substance use when relevant, then direct those facts to the anesthesia professional. It must not select an anesthetic, instruct medication changes, or infer safety from a short list. The [ASA adult preparation checklist](https://madeforthismoment.asahq.org/preparing-for-surgery/prep/preparing-for-surgery-checklist/) explains why these histories belong in a preoperative anesthesia conversation.
  • Distinguish clinical suitability from practical support: The team may need to discuss health risks, psychological needs, likely recovery, and whether support at home is available. These inputs can change the discussion but cannot be converted into a course-created 'fit' score. The [RCS professional standards](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/standards-and-guidance/service-standards/cosmetic-surgery/professional-standards-for-cosmetic-surgery/) emphasize individual needs and psychologically vulnerable patients; the [ASA checklist](https://madeforthismoment.asahq.org/preparing-for-surgery/prep/preparing-for-surgery-checklist/) encourages recovery questions for the responsible care team.
  • Route unexpected findings for individualized review: If a fictional record reveals an unaddressed symptom, conflicting medication list, or incomplete history, identify who should clarify it and pause the planning conclusion. Do not label the person unsafe or reassure them that the issue is harmless. The [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/) notes that a surgeon may seek a colleague's advice or refer onward before deciding whether to perform surgery; the course exercise stops at the handoff.
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional 47-year-old adult, Elias, has an incomplete medication list, mentions a past unpleasant anesthesia experience, and is unsure whether a long-standing symptom is relevant. Create a six-item question and information handoff for the operating surgeon and anesthesia team, showing known facts, unknowns, and who must clarify each.

Pass criteria: Pass when at least six history or support questions are organized, the medication and anesthesia details are routed to qualified reviewers, the unexplained symptom is flagged without diagnosis, unknowns are visible, and no medicine instruction, anesthetic choice, risk score, or surgery clearance appears.

06Procedure, Surgeon, and Care-Setting Fit

Learning objective

Build a three-part verification and consultation question list that distinguishes the proposed procedure, named surgeon, and intended facility, with an evidence source and unresolved question for each.

In this lesson

  • Check the proposed procedure against the actual goal: Ask the operating surgeon what intervention is proposed, why it might address the adult's stated goal, what alternatives exist, and what it cannot change. A procedure name on a brochure is not an individualized recommendation. The [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/) asks about realistic results, evidence, and the surgeon's experience with the procedure; [NHS preparation advice](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/before-you-have-a-cosmetic-procedure/) urges direct questions before commitment.
  • Verify the named professional in the relevant jurisdiction: Record the surgeon's name, claimed training or credentials, experience with the proposed procedure, and the local official body that can confirm registration or status. Membership, testimonials, and a profile page answer different questions from a regulator record. The [NHS practitioner guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/choosing-who-will-do-your-procedure/) gives UK-specific registration checks; the [ASPS question list](https://www.plasticsurgery.org/patient-safety/?sub=Questions+to+Ask+Your+Plastic+Surgeon) offers U.S.-focused prompts about board certification, experience, and privileges.
  • Check the exact care setting and continuity route: Ask where the proposed procedure would occur, which regulator or accreditor oversees that site, and how complications and follow-up would be handled. A qualified surgeon's credential does not establish a particular facility's status or aftercare arrangements. The [RCS hospital guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/choosing-a-surgeon-and-hospital/) identifies separate UK facility checks; the [ASPS question list](https://www.plasticsurgery.org/patient-safety/?sub=Questions+to+Ask+Your+Plastic+Surgeon) separates hospital privileges, site accreditation, and complication management. [CQC choosing cosmetic surgery (England)](https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/help-choosing-care/choosing-cosmetic-surgery).
  • Treat fit as a clinician-led synthesis: List what is verified, what the treating surgeon still needs to assess, and what the adult needs explained before deciding. A positive record for one component cannot fill gaps in another, and the learner should not award an overall 'safe' or 'approved' label. The [NHS practitioner guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/choosing-who-will-do-your-procedure/) asks for a consultation with the person performing the procedure and questions about complications and aftercare.
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional 55-year-old adult, Noor, sees a clinic profile naming an experienced surgeon but no facility address; a brochure lists a procedure that may not match Noor's stated goal. Make separate procedure, surgeon, and site rows with the claim, a primary verification route, two consultation questions, and an unresolved status for each.

Pass criteria: Pass when all three rows remain separate, the mismatch between Noor's goal and the advertised procedure is raised with the operating surgeon, jurisdiction-specific checks are identified without treating a badge as proof, missing site and aftercare facts are explicit, and no global endorsement or candidacy verdict is given.

Module checkpoint

A fictional adult has two clinic brochures, one less-invasive service advertisement, an incomplete health summary, and no confirmed operating site. Prepare a three-option comparison and a procedure/surgeon/facility question register, with each unresolved clinical issue assigned to the treating surgeon or relevant care professional. Pass requires a live no-intervention option, no self-issued suitability clearance, separate professional and facility evidence, and no promotional claim converted into a guaranteed result. [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/); [NHS practitioner guide](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/choosing-who-will-do-your-procedure/).

Module 03 · Lessons 7–10

Risk, Consent, and Recovery Essentials

Compare material trade-offs, prepare questions for a treating-clinician-led decision conversation, and establish essential recovery and complication-response questions.

Adult holding a cup beside a sunlit window, with a phone on a nearby table.
07Benefits, Material Risks, Costs, and Uncertainty

Learning objective

Build a four-column comparison of a fictional adult's stated goals, potential benefits, material harms, and financial uncertainty, with at least two unanswered questions for the treating clinician.

In this lesson

  • Translate a desired change into a bounded potential benefit: Begin with the adult's own goal and ask what degree of change would be meaningful, what might remain unchanged, and how the result would be judged over time. A photograph or promotional claim cannot establish an individual outcome. Record the treating surgeon's explanation as a question still to be answered, rather than predicting benefit from the course exercise. [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/); [GMC maintaining trust](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/maintaining-trust).
  • Compare harms that matter to this person: Separate common side effects, less common complications, possible failure to meet expectations, and psychological effects. Ask the treating team which harms are material for the proposed procedure and this adult's concerns, and how uncertainty will be explained. Do not turn a generic list into a personal risk estimate. [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork); [NHS before a procedure](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/before-you-have-a-cosmetic-procedure/).
  • Make the comparison include no procedure: A fair comparison keeps no intervention and reasonable less-invasive options visible alongside surgery. For each option, note the goal it might address, what evidence is missing, what burdens it creates, and whether it may require future review. A learner can organize these questions but cannot select the best option or declare suitability. [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/); [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork).
  • Show the full financial question, not a single price: List the quoted procedure fee separately from consultation, facility, anesthesia, aftercare, time away from work, possible additional care, and cancellation or withdrawal terms. Mark each amount as confirmed, estimate, excluded, or unknown; do not invent a universal cost. Ask the provider to explain what the quote covers and who pays if the plan changes. [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/); [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork).
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional adult, Mara, wants a visible but natural change and has received a short clinic quote with no aftercare detail. Prepare a four-column comparison for surgery, a reasonable less-invasive option, and no intervention; list three material-risk questions and label every unconfirmed cost or outcome.

Pass criteria: Pass when all three options remain open, at least one physical and one psychological or expectation-related harm are identified for clinician discussion, the quote is separated from possible added costs, and no personal probability, suitability verdict, or guaranteed benefit is asserted.

08Anesthesia, Facility, and Emergency-Response Questions

Learning objective

Write a role-specific question sheet that identifies the anesthesia professional, care setting, emergency pathway, and unresolved safety information for a fictional proposal without choosing an anesthetic approach.

In this lesson

  • Identify the responsible anesthesia conversation: Ask who will assess and provide anesthesia care, when the adult can speak with that professional, and how prior anesthesia experiences, health conditions, allergies, medicines, and supplements should be disclosed. These are prompts for a qualified assessment, not instructions to stop a medicine, fast, or select a technique. [ASA preparation checklist](https://madeforthismoment.asahq.org/preparing-for-surgery/prep/preparing-for-surgery-checklist/); [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/).
  • Verify where care would occur: Record the exact facility name and proposed setting, then ask which licensing, inspection, or accreditation rules apply there and how the patient can verify them through the relevant local authority. A clinic brand, surgeon credential, or reassuring website is not itself a facility check. Requirements vary by jurisdiction. [ASA preparation checklist](https://madeforthismoment.asahq.org/preparing-for-surgery/prep/preparing-for-surgery-checklist/); [RCS choosing a surgeon and hospital](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/choosing-a-surgeon-and-hospital/).
  • Ask about response capability and transfer: Request a plain-language account of who recognizes and manages an unexpected event, what equipment and trained staff are available, and how transfer to a higher level of care is arranged if needed. Record the answer and owner, leaving clinical adequacy to qualified reviewers. A generic statement that emergencies are covered does not identify a usable pathway. [ASA preparation checklist](https://madeforthismoment.asahq.org/preparing-for-surgery/prep/preparing-for-surgery-checklist/); [ASPS patient-safety questions](https://www.plasticsurgery.org/patient-safety/?sub=Questions+to+Ask+Your+Plastic+Surgeon).
  • Connect the setting to continuity after discharge: Ask who will provide immediate postoperative review, who takes an out-of-hours call, and how the surgeon and facility coordinate if a problem occurs after departure. The answers should name a role and a reachable route, not merely promise availability. A learner records gaps for the care team and does not issue a facility approval. [RCS choosing a surgeon and hospital](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/choosing-a-surgeon-and-hospital/); [NHS choosing a practitioner](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/choosing-who-will-do-your-procedure/).
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional adult, Idris, receives a proposal naming the surgeon and procedure but only a city for the facility and no anesthesia contact. Produce a question sheet for the surgeon, anesthesia professional, and facility, plus an unresolved-item ledger with an owner for each missing answer.

Pass criteria: Pass when the sheet asks who conducts the anesthesia assessment, names the facility verification question, asks about emergency capability and transfer, and identifies an out-of-hours route; it must contain no anesthetic selection, preparation instruction, or declaration that the setting is safe.

09Consent, Reflection, and Unresolved Questions

Learning objective

Prepare a dated question-and-uncertainty record for a fictional adult's treating-clinician-led consent discussion, including a reflection step and an explicit option to defer.

In this lesson

  • Keep the consent conversation with the treating clinician: The medical professional who will carry out or supervise the cosmetic intervention must discuss it with the patient and seek consent under the cited UK guidance. Coordinators and learners can help assemble questions and route unanswered items, but cannot substitute a course checklist, brochure, or administrative signature for that conversation. Apply local law and professional roles outside the UK. [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork). [GMC decision-making and consent](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/decision-making-and-consent).
  • Prepare questions across options, risks, and preferences: The adult can ask what the proposed intervention may and may not achieve, what reasonable alternatives exist, which adverse outcomes matter to them, and what follow-up would involve. Write the person's concerns in their own words and leave space for the treating clinician's answer and any remaining uncertainty. A completed worksheet is preparation, not evidence that informed consent occurred. [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/); [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork).
  • Protect reflection and freedom from pressure: Record whether the adult has had enough information and time to consider the decision, whether a sales deadline or another person's preference is influencing it, and whether another conversation would help. The cited UK guidance emphasizes voluntary choice and says the patient can change their mind. Do not convert a particular reflection interval from one jurisdiction into a universal rule. [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork); [NHS right for me](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/). [RCS Good Surgical Practice, Domain 2](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/good-surgical-practice/domain-2/).
  • Treat unanswered material questions as open: For every material question, record who will answer it, when a response can be reviewed, and whether the decision remains on hold meanwhile. If the adult expresses distress, coercion, or uncertainty about understanding, direct the concern to the qualified team without diagnosing capacity or making a suitability finding. A revised plan may include another consultation or no procedure. [GMC patient guide](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/patient-guides-and-materials/cosmetic-procedures-what-do-i-need-to-consider); [RCS professional standards](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/standards-and-guidance/service-standards/cosmetic-surgery/professional-standards-for-cosmetic-surgery/).
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional adult, Elise, has been offered a limited-time discount and has not discussed one personally important complication with the operating clinician. Draft a dated preparation record with her unanswered question, the proper clinician owner, a reflection step, and wording that preserves her ability to decline or defer.

Pass criteria: Pass when the record leaves the decision open, explicitly assigns the procedure-and-risk discussion and consent to the treating clinician, identifies the sales pressure without diagnosing the adult, and does not treat a form, coordinator, learner, or preset interval as sufficient consent.

10Recovery Support, Follow-Up, and Escalation Planning

Learning objective

Create a fictional recovery-support map with named contacts, planned review questions, and a clinician-specified escalation route, while leaving symptom thresholds and care instructions to the treating team.

In this lesson

  • Ask for individualized recovery expectations: Request the treating team's explanation of expected limitations, review schedule, home-care responsibilities, and variation in recovery for the actual procedure. Capture practical effects on daily life without promising a return-to-work date or writing wound-care instructions. A generic web timeline cannot replace the clinician's plan. [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/); [ASA preparation checklist](https://madeforthismoment.asahq.org/preparing-for-surgery/prep/preparing-for-surgery-checklist/).
  • Match support tasks to real people: Ask whether transport, help at home, childcare, or assistance with ordinary activities may be needed, and record who has actually agreed to each task. Keep the list conditional until the treating team clarifies procedure-specific needs. A patient should not be left with an assumed helper or a vague promise that someone at the clinic will coordinate everything. [ASA preparation checklist](https://madeforthismoment.asahq.org/preparing-for-surgery/prep/preparing-for-surgery-checklist/); [RCS choosing a surgeon and hospital](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/choosing-a-surgeon-and-hospital/).
  • Record follow-up ownership and access: Find out who performs routine follow-up, where it occurs, what is included in the quoted aftercare, and how the patient can reach a named qualified professional outside ordinary hours. Note the surgeon and facility responsibilities separately. Do not presume that an online portal or general helpline can manage complications. [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork); [RCS after-surgery guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/after-surgery/). [NHS after-surgery advice](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/having-surgery/afterwards/).
  • Build a response route without inventing thresholds: Ask the team to provide procedure-specific written guidance on which concerns require contact, which route is used after hours, and how emergency care is accessed locally. The learner records the route, a backup, and the date the patient received it. This exercise must not assign numerical symptom thresholds or decide that a fictional event is clinically harmless. [RCS after-surgery guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/after-surgery/); [NHS choosing a practitioner](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/choosing-who-will-do-your-procedure/).
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional adult, Nia, lives alone and has a proposed outpatient procedure. The clinic brochure mentions follow-up but names no contact or transport arrangement. Prepare a conditional support map with missing questions, actual owners, a routine-review contact, an out-of-hours route, and a backup to confirm with the team.

Pass criteria: Pass when the map distinguishes agreed support from assumptions, has named owners for routine and urgent contact questions, requests written team-specific instructions, and avoids postoperative thresholds, treatment directions, and fixed recovery promises.

Module checkpoint

A fictional adult considering elective cosmetic surgery has a partial price quote, unanswered anesthesia and facility questions, a promotional deadline, and no out-of-hours complication contact. Produce a one-page Foundation decision record comparing surgery, a reasonable alternative, and no intervention; include material-risk and cost questions, a role-specific anesthesia and facility inquiry, a treating-clinician-led consent question list, reflection status, and a conditional recovery contact map. Pass requires every unknown to have an owner, no claim of suitability or promised outcome, no learner-obtained consent, no anesthetic instruction, and no invented postoperative threshold. [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork); [ASA preparation checklist](https://madeforthismoment.asahq.org/preparing-for-surgery/prep/preparing-for-surgery-checklist/); [RCS after-surgery guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/after-surgery/).

Module 04 · Lessons 11–14

Coordination and Plan Review

Turn an informed but conditional decision into a practical record that can be checked, revised, or paused.

Unmarked folder, small fabric pouch and keys on a table beside an empty chair.
11Timing, Work, Travel, and Home-Support ArrangementsFull course

Learning objective

Draft a conditional logistics calendar for a fictional adult that separates confirmed commitments from clinician-dependent timing and names a backup for transport or home support.

In this lesson

  • Make timing conditional on clinical advice: List possible consultation, assessment, procedure, and follow-up dates as provisional until the qualified team confirms suitability, setting, and expected recovery needs. Ask which activities may be limited and when they can be reviewed. Do not set a universal interval for work, exercise, or travel; those answers depend on the procedure and person. [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/); [ASA preparation checklist](https://madeforthismoment.asahq.org/preparing-for-surgery/prep/preparing-for-surgery-checklist/).
  • Map work and caregiving obligations: Record essential duties, whether time away can be arranged, who would cover dependent-care tasks, and which workplace disclosures the adult chooses to make. Ask the clinical team what functional limitations should inform those arrangements. Preserve privacy and avoid assuming that a procedure is minor because the visit is outpatient or elective. [NHS before a procedure](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/before-you-have-a-cosmetic-procedure/); [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/).
  • Plan transport and a realistic home handoff: Ask the team whether an escort, transport, or help at home will be required. Record the actual person's availability, contact route, and backup; do not treat an unasked friend or ride service as confirmed support. The anesthesia professional and treating team set specific discharge and activity requirements. [ASA preparation checklist](https://madeforthismoment.asahq.org/preparing-for-surgery/prep/preparing-for-surgery-checklist/). [NHS preparation for surgery](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/having-surgery/preparation/).
  • Treat travel as a follow-up problem as well as a journey: If travel is involved, ask where reviews will happen, who handles a complication after return, how records move between teams, and what additional costs or delays might arise. Avoid a fixed safe-to-fly rule; a qualified clinician must address individual timing. Different jurisdictions may have different provider, insurance, and access arrangements. [RCS surgery-abroad guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/having-surgery-abroad/).
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional adult, Owen, has a demanding job, a planned family trip, and a friend who may be available to help after surgery. Build a conditional calendar that marks team-dependent dates, work and travel questions, support commitments to verify, and a backup contact.

Pass criteria: Pass when no recovery or travel date is guaranteed, every logistical dependency is marked confirmed or pending, the helper has a verification step and backup, and the treating team owns procedure-specific activity and travel guidance.

12Contingencies, Additional Care, and Cost ScenariosFull course

Learning objective

Construct three nonclinical cost-and-care scenarios for a fictional proposal, showing who confirms coverage, follow-up access, and possible additional expenses without predicting a complication.

In this lesson

  • Distinguish the quoted base case from unknown extras: Start with an itemized quote and identify what it includes: clinical fees, facility, anesthesia, routine review, and any named aftercare period. Mark missing prices and terms as questions for the provider. The comparison should also include lost income, travel, and support costs where relevant. An advertised price is not proof of the total financial exposure. [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/); [NHS before a procedure](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/before-you-have-a-cosmetic-procedure/).
  • Model a change or cancellation without pressure: Ask what happens to payments if the adult defers, changes their mind, the treating team advises against proceeding, or the date changes. Record refund, rescheduling, and expiry terms as written facts or unknowns. A financial commitment must not be presented as a reason to bypass reflection or clinical review. [GMC maintaining trust](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/maintaining-trust); [RCS consultation guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/your-consultation/).
  • Ask who coordinates additional care: If an unexpected problem or unsatisfactory outcome requires further assessment, the plan should identify a qualified clinical contact, where review can occur, and whether another provider might become involved. Record which service or insurer will explain coverage; do not promise a free revision or define a clinical remedy. [RCS after-surgery guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/after-surgery/); [ASPS patient-safety questions](https://www.plasticsurgery.org/patient-safety/?sub=Questions+to+Ask+Your+Plastic+Surgeon).
  • Test a travel-related contingency separately: Where surgery and home are in different places, ask whether a return visit, local specialist review, extra lodging, or changed travel could be needed and who arranges each. Check actual insurance wording with the provider, rather than assuming ordinary travel coverage. The scenario is a planning stress test, not a forecast that a complication will occur. [RCS surgery-abroad guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/having-surgery-abroad/).
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional adult, Priya, compares a local clinic quote with a lower advertised price in another country. Prepare base-case, deferral, and additional-care scenarios with a question list on aftercare, insurance, possible return travel, and responsibility for payment; leave all unquoted amounts unknown.

Pass criteria: Pass when each scenario distinguishes known price from unresolved cost, has a provider or insurer owner for coverage questions, protects the option to defer, and avoids a predicted complication, assured revision, or unsupported claim about insurance.

13Written Responsibilities, Handoffs, and Information PrivacyFull course

Learning objective

Produce a fictional responsibility-and-handoff register that names owners, recipients, consent or authorization questions, and minimum necessary information for routine and complication-related communication.

In this lesson

  • Assign each handoff to a named role: Separate the surgeon's clinical explanations, anesthesia assessment, facility logistics, routine follow-up, and out-of-hours complication response. Record who sends a message, who receives it, how receipt is confirmed, and what remains unanswered. Administrative coordination can track the handoff but cannot take over a clinician's judgment. [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork); [RCS after-surgery guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/after-surgery/). [RCS Good Surgical Practice, Domain 3](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/good-surgical-practice/domain-3/).
  • Keep a usable record for future care: Ask what written summary the patient will receive about the intervention, relevant products or devices, and the contact plan, so another qualified professional can understand what happened if care transfers. A training case uses fictional details only. Actual clinical records must follow local professional and data rules, not this course template. [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork); [RCS after-surgery guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/after-surgery/).
  • Confirm the sharing basis and limit the audience: Document the patient's preference and the applicable permission or lawful basis for sharing information with a GP, another treating professional, or a support person. Share the information needed for the stated care purpose through an approved channel, and ask the responsible privacy professional when the rule is unclear. The cited GMC duties are UK-specific and do not create a universal consent formula. [GMC communication guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/communication-partnership-and-teamwork). [GMC direct-care confidentiality guidance](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/confidentiality/using-and-disclosing-patient-information-for-direct-care).
  • Preserve continuity across locations: For a patient returning home after care elsewhere, identify who can provide records, how a local clinician can contact the original team, and what language or access barrier may delay communication. Record unresolved cross-border transfer and aftercare questions before travel is booked. Do not assume the home service has accepted responsibility. [RCS surgery-abroad guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/having-surgery-abroad/); [NHS choosing a practitioner](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/choosing-who-will-do-your-procedure/).
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional adult, Sofia, is considering treatment away from home and wants her regular clinician informed but does not want a family member copied. Make a handoff register for the treating team, aftercare contact, regular clinician, and support person, including the information needed, permission question, sender, recipient, and confirmation step.

Pass criteria: Pass when every handoff has a responsible sender and recipient, the family member is not automatically copied, the regular-clinician sharing preference is recorded for qualified review, a future-care summary is requested, and no blanket privacy or cross-border legal rule is invented.

14Review the Plan and Preserve the Option to DeferFull course

Learning objective

Audit a fictional decision plan against seven explicit review fields, then document either a conditional next discussion or a deferral with unanswered questions and a review owner.

In this lesson

  • Review the plan as a dated snapshot: Check that goals, reasonable options, treating-team answers, material risks, costs, support, and follow-up contacts are recorded with dates and sources. Label each field confirmed, provisional, or unanswered, and note what changed since the prior version. A complete-looking file can still leave the decision open if a material question lacks a qualified answer. [GMC patient guide](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/patient-guides-and-materials/cosmetic-procedures-what-do-i-need-to-consider); [NHS right for me](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/).
  • Test coherence without declaring readiness: Look for conflicts: an outcome expectation the clinician has not addressed, an unverified support person, an incomplete anesthesia or facility answer, or travel that would interrupt review. Send clinical questions to the treating team and practical gaps to their owners. The learner's audit grades the quality of planning, not the person's eligibility or a provider's approval. [GMC patient guide](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/patient-guides-and-materials/cosmetic-procedures-what-do-i-need-to-consider); [RCS surgery-abroad guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/having-surgery-abroad/).
  • Write a meaningful deferral route: Deferral can mean gathering another answer, considering a different option, seeking another qualified opinion, or choosing no procedure. Record what would prompt a later review and who will contact whom, without imposing a deadline or treating indecision as failure. Financial promotions must not close the adult's option to pause. [NHS right for me](https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cosmetic-procedures/advice/cosmetic-procedure-right-for-me/); [GMC maintaining trust](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/maintaining-trust).
  • Communicate a bounded next step: A final educational output may say that the adult has questions ready for a treating-clinician discussion, that logistical commitments need confirmation, or that the person prefers to defer. It cannot state that consent is complete, surgery should proceed, or a particular result is likely. Include a version date and a named owner for each open item so the plan can be revisited. [GMC patient guide](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/patient-guides-and-materials/cosmetic-procedures-what-do-i-need-to-consider); [GMC maintaining trust](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/maintaining-trust).
Independent fictional exercise

A fictional adult, Daniel, has a detailed brochure, an unresolved question about a material risk, a helper who has not confirmed availability, and a trip that may conflict with follow-up. Audit his draft plan, assign each open item to a responsible person, and write two acceptable next-step statements: one for a further clinician discussion and one for deferral.

Pass criteria: Pass when all seven review fields are dated and labeled, each conflict has an owner, the deferral route remains real and pressure-free, and neither next-step statement declares candidacy, completed consent, a safe timetable, or a guaranteed result.

Module checkpoint

A fictional adult has a proposed date, two conflicting cost summaries, a possible helper who has not committed, planned international travel, an incomplete handoff to a regular clinician, and one unanswered material-risk question. Produce a dated conditional plan with logistics, base and additional-care cost scenarios, responsibility and privacy-aware handoffs, and a final review table. Pass requires a source or owner for each open item, clinician ownership of medical and consent questions, no assumed insurance or recovery timetable, and a documented choice to defer while the gaps remain. [RCS surgery-abroad guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/having-surgery-abroad/); [RCS after-surgery guide](https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/patient-care/cosmetic-surgery/after-surgery/); [GMC maintaining trust](https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/the-professional-standards/cosmetic-interventions/maintaining-trust).

Selected reading · 22 sources

Structured case-based study

Read the case.
Map the questions.
Review the choice.

The written curriculum contains 14 measurable objectives, 56 developed topics, 14 independent fictional exercises with pass criteria, four module checkpoints and 22 source-mapped readings. Learners can work through the prompts in their own notes. Faculty, recordings, duration and access period are unconfirmed; current delivery details are supplied by email before payment.

  1. Start with goals and optionsDistinguish what the adult hopes to change from what remains uncertain, including the option to do nothing.
  2. Record risks and responsibilitiesCapture material-risk, cost, facility, anesthesia, recovery and contact questions for the appropriate care professional.
  3. Revisit the decisionBuild a conditional next-step record and preserve a clear route to delay or defer while questions remain open.
Adult taking notes on a blank sheet while studying at a laptop.
Editorial artwork about independent study; it does not show a course platform, live teaching, supplied materials or a certificate.

Fictional planning exercises

Practice a decision
that can be reviewed.

Each lesson provides a fictional prompt and pass criteria; each module closes with a synthesis checkpoint. Learners make their own notes. Real-patient records, surgical demonstrations and downloadable planning tools are not represented as included materials.

Patient-owned goals and open-question map

Surgery, alternative and no-intervention comparison

Health, practitioner and facility question register

Material-risk, cost and consent-conversation prompts

Conditional recovery and escalation contact map

Responsibility, privacy and final-review record

Two course packages

Choose your level of study.

One-time package price in USD.
Current delivery details and access timing are confirmed by email before payment.

First 10 lessons · Modules 1–3

Foundation package

$19USD · one-time

Map adult goals, alternatives, suitability questions, material trade-offs, consent questions and recovery essentials.

  • Lessons 1–3: goals and decision readiness
  • Lessons 4–6: options and suitability inputs
  • Lessons 7–10: risks, consent and recovery questions
  • Ten independent fictional exercises with pass criteria
  • First three module checkpoints and source-mapped reading
Choose the $19 package

All 14 lessons · 4 modules

Full course

$29USD · one-time

The complete curriculum adds conditional logistics, cost scenarios, privacy-aware handoffs and a final review or deferral record.

  • Everything in the first ten lessons
  • Lessons 11–12: timing, support and cost scenarios
  • Lessons 13–14: responsibilities, handoffs and final review
  • Fourteen independent fictional exercises with pass criteria
  • All four module checkpoints and source-mapped reading
Choose the $29 package
01

Choose a package
and complete the form.

02

Review delivery details
and access timing by email before payment.

03

Payment and access
are arranged manually after you confirm the details.

Course application

Start with an
open decision map.

Leave your name and email. We will send payment details manually with current delivery and access timing for your review before payment.

We email payment and current delivery details manually. Confirm access timing before payment.

Course questions

Before you
start learning.

Have another question?
Contact us

Who is this course for?

It is intended for clinicians, clinical coordinators, educators and advanced trainees working within their roles. The general questions may also help an adult prepare for a qualified consultation; they do not replace one.

Does the course recommend cosmetic surgery?

No. It treats surgery, reasonable alternatives, no intervention, further assessment and deferral as possibilities. A request alone does not establish suitability or a preferred procedure.

What does each package include?

The $19 USD Foundation package covers lessons 1–10, ten fictional exercises and the first three module checkpoints: goals, options, suitability questions, material trade-offs, consent questions and recovery essentials. The $29 USD Full course covers all 14 lessons, 14 exercises and four checkpoints, adding timing, support, cost scenarios, handoffs and final review.

Will I receive an individual surgical plan?

No. The exercises create general decision maps and conditional question records. Diagnosis, suitability, procedure choice, anesthesia, consent and patient-specific planning remain with qualified treating professionals.

How are risks and consent handled?

The fictional cases ask learners to list material harms, alternatives, unresolved questions and reflection needs. They do not set postoperative instructions, obtain consent or use a signature as a substitute for a treating-clinician-led conversation.

Does the course give a recovery timetable?

No fixed personal timetable is promised. Learners identify which support, follow-up and escalation arrangements need confirmation from the care team for a particular person and procedure.

Are faculty, recordings or certificates included?

The displayed curriculum includes 14 fictional case prompts with pass criteria, four module checkpoints and source-mapped reading. Faculty, recordings, duration, access period, certificates and accreditation have not been confirmed.

How do I apply and get access?

Choose a package and submit your name and email. We will send payment details manually with current delivery and access timing for review before payment. Sending the form does not grant instant access.

Do the illustrations show patients or treatment results?

No. All seven are fictional editorial artwork. They do not document a patient, a clinical consultation, an approved surgical plan, a procedure or a before-and-after result.